SEND Reform Risks Repeating Mistakes of the Past

22 April 2026

Children’s Law Centre calls for halt on “potentially damaging” revised SEND framework

Legal experts criticise approach that risks undermining strong legal safeguards for children and young people

Serious concern raised at “break with due process” and lack of transparency

The Children’s Law Centre has published an open letter, raising alarm around significant and potentially damaging changes to the system that provides support to children with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND). The open letter, published on Wednesday 22nd April and endorsed by 14 other organisations – including unions – states that the new direction undermines decades of work with expert stakeholders, fails to address the issues around capacity and resources and places increased pressure on schools. This is despite repeated critical reports highlighting failures within the Education Authority, which will not be properly addressed.

Specialist SEND Legal Adviser at the Children’s Law Centre, Rachel Hogan, BL said: “The Children’s Law Centre is seriously concerned that the current reform to the support for children with special educational needs and disabilities is repeating the failures of the past. Rather than address the issues that have been well researched and articulated over past decades, the proposed reforms run the risk of undermining the legal framework that supports children, compounding the current failures.

“The Children’s Law Centre and others have committed many years of work to the Education Authority and the Department of Education to ensure the SEND system provides the proper support for children and young people. However, this sudden change of direction has abandoned that work and risks rushing through reforms that potentially make the situation worse, with very little scrutiny.

“These changes do not reflect what has been recommended in numerous reports and by expert stakeholders, including the Children’s Law Centre, other specialist organisations, teaching professionals and parents. They seek to shift the responsibility to schools and water down children’s individual rights. The implementation of the revised SEND framework must now stop”.

The letter has been endorsed by:

  • CiNI
  • SENAC
  • Angel Eyes NI
  • National Autistic Society
  • The Fostering Network
  • ADD-NI Children’s Charity
  • The Centre for Children’s Rights, Queen’s University Belfast
  • Northern Ireland Teachers’ Council
  • NASUWT
  • INTO
  • UTU
  • NEU
  • NAHT
  • UNISON

To add your organisation’s name to the list of endorsements, please contact Rachel@childrenslawcentre.org

Join the Board of Trustees at the Children’s Law Centre – Applications Now Open

14 April 2026

The Children’s Law Centre (CLC) is seeking passionate, committed individuals to join our Board of Trustees and help shape the next phase of our organisation’s development.

This is an exciting time to join us. We are currently developing our new strategic plan and in 2027, CLC will mark 30 years of championing children’s rights in Northern Ireland. We are looking for people who share our vision of a society where all children and young people have their rights respected, protected, and fulfilled.

How to Apply

To apply, please submit:

  • Your CV.
  • A cover letter outlining why you are interested in becoming a Trustee and what you would bring to the role.
  • A completed monitoring form.

Applications should be sent to: reception@childrenslawcentre.org

CLC Presents Evidence to the Committee for Communities on the Children’s Services Co‑operation Act

12 March 2026

The Children’s Law Centre (CLC) has presented evidence to the NI Assembly Committee for Communities as part of its scrutiny of the implementation of the Children’s Services Co‑operation Act (Northern Ireland) 2015 (CSCA).

During the session, CLC outlined the significant gap between the promise of the CSCA and the practical reality experienced by children and young people a decade after the legislation was enacted. While there has been some progress, including the adoption of a children and young people’s strategy and examples of effective joint working, CLC maintains that these developments are not yet embedded as a consistent, system‑wide approach to improving well‑being.

CLC’s Written Evidence Highlights Several Key Issues:

Lack of consistent, outcomes‑focused co‑operation

Reports on the operation of the Act show that cross‑departmental co‑operation is still often ad hoc, reactive and not clearly driven by the statutory duty set out in the CSCA.

Insufficient measurement of impact on children’s well‑being

Despite the intent of the Act, government has yet to demonstrate, through data, shared metrics or transparent reporting, how children’s well‑being has tangibly improved. The system remains stronger on describing activity than evidencing outcomes.

Barriers to pooling resources and aligning systems

Departments remain unclear or hesitant about the CSCA’s enabling powers and opportunities for deeper collaboration are being missed. Guidance exists, but it is under used in practice.

Need for meaningful engagement with children and young people

Comments from young people reinforce that children do not feel genuinely involved in shaping decisions that affect them. Participation remains inconsistent and often tokenistic.

What’s Next for the Children’s Services Co-operation Act?

The second decade of the CSCA must focus on implementation, measurement and accountability, with a renewed commitment to co‑operation rooted in children’s rights. This includes:

  • Establishing shared indicators of well‑being
  • Transparent data collection
  • Stable long‑term planning
  • Co‑designing improvements with children and families.

CLC will continue to work with decision makers, duty bearers and young people to ensure the Act reaches its full potential as a system wide driver for improving the lives of all children and young people in Northern Ireland.

Concerns Raised Around UK Government’s Latest Immigration Proposals

02 March 2026

The Children’s Law Centre and South Tyrone Empowerment Programme (STEP) have jointly responded to the UK Government’s consultation on A Fairer Pathway to Settlement, raising serious concerns about the impact of the proposals on children and families.

In responding, the organisations describe the government’s proposals as “wrong, harmful and dangerous” and call for them to be withdrawn in their entirety.

CLC and STEP have warned that the proposals fail to meaningfully consider the UK’s obligations under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC). The principle that the best interests of the child must be a primary consideration is not reflected in measures that would:

  • Lengthen and prolong routes to settlement for many families, potentially across the entirety of a child’s childhood;
  • Introduce or expand “no recourse to public funds” conditions, increasing child poverty and homelessness;
  • Restrict family reunion routes;
  • Apply changes retrospectively, penalising families for having lawfully accessed support; and
  • Create additional barriers to children registering as British citizens.

Deirdre McAliskey, Policy and Engagement Manager at STEP said: “We firmly reject the concept of ‘earned settlement’. Tying settlement to income levels, volunteering requirements or past use of public funds risks creating a discriminatory, two-tier system that disproportionately harms children from low-income households, single-parent families and those with insecure immigration status.

“Children have no control over their family’s income, migration journey or immigration applications, yet would bear the long-term consequences of extended insecurity and restricted access to support.

“Settlement is not a reward to be earned but a necessary foundation for safety, stability and full participation in society.”

Fergal McFerran, Policy and Public Affairs Manager at the Children’s Law Centre said: “Longer and more complex routes to settlement such as those proposed by the UK Government will increase the risk of destitution, homelessness and exploitation.

“We urge the government to abandon the current proposals and replace them with fair and safe processes that uphold children’s rights and provide clear, timely routes to settlement. Fairness must mean protecting children from poverty, insecurity and discrimination – not embedding those risks into law.

“Children seeking safety in the UK deserve stability and dignity, not a childhood defined by uncertainty.”

Ten is Too Young Coalition Welcomes Tabling of Amendment to Raise the Minimum Age of Criminal Responsibility to 16

26 February 2026

The Ten is Too Young Coalition has welcomed the tabling of an amendment to the Justice Bill that would raise Northern Ireland’s minimum age of criminal responsibility (MACR) from 10 to 16 years old, without exception.

The Coalition has once again reiterated its position that at 10 years old, Northern Ireland’s age of criminal responsibility is too young. It said the latest amendment that has been tabled is the most evidence-based and rights compliant, and marks an historic opportunity to finally end Northern Ireland’s status as having one of the lowest ages of criminal responsibility in the world.

For more than 30 years, children’s organisations, experts in child development and human rights bodies have been calling for meaningful reform, with victims’ advocates now also joining the calls. The support to raise the age is now widespread.

Chris Quinn, Northern Ireland Commissioner for Children and Young People, said: “We strongly welcome the tabling of the amendment setting the age at 16 with no exceptions.

“For over 30 years, organisations working with children have been clear, Northern Ireland’s current age of 10 is indefensible. It is out of step with international standards, out of step with science and out of step with the values we claim to hold about protecting children.

“This is a once in a generation chance to make our justice system fairer, safer and more effective. We cannot look back in years to come and realise we missed it.”

Fergal McFerran, Policy and Public Affairs Manager at the Children’s Law Centre, said: “Raising the age of criminal responsibility to 16 is not only the most rights compliant option – it is the approach that provides the best opportunity to deliver better outcomes for children, families and communities.

“Over a decade of scientific evidence tells us that children under 16 simply do not have the cognitive maturity to be held criminally responsible in the same way as adults. Criminalising them at 10 years old is wholly inconsistent with what we know about child development, and how we treat children with respect to other laws.

“What’s more, criminalising children simply doesn’t work. We know that 10 is too young, and MLAs now need to grasp this opportunity to support the most child rights compliant change to legislation as possible.”

The Ten is Too Young Coalition stressed that while it welcomes all efforts to raise the age, 16 without exceptions is the only option fully aligned with international children’s rights standards, including the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and General Comment No. 24, which encourages states to move towards 15 or 16 in line with developmental science.

The Coalition also cautioned against introducing exceptions for certain offences, citing clear UN guidance that exceptions are not grounded in evidence and undermine the purpose of the reform.

The Ten is Too Young Coalition is urging all MLAs to:

  • Recognise that 10 is too young, and that criminalising children does not work.
  • Maximise this opportunity by supporting the strongest amendment available.
  • Recognise that children in conflict with the law are overwhelmingly vulnerable children, and those in need.
  • Prioritise approaches that reduce reoffending, prevent future victims and give children the chance to turn their lives around.

With multiple amendments now tabled – seeking to set the age at 12 in some cases, 14 in some cases, and most recently to 16 – the Coalition is urging MLAs to ensure this long overdue issue receives full and serious debate in the Assembly chamber.