Stop Recruiting Children, Rights Groups Tell MOD

23 June 2021

The Children’s Law Centre joined numerous human rights organisations in calling for the Ministry of Defence to end the recruitment of children to the UK military.

In a joint letter to the Defence Secretary, the groups call on the UK government to use the Armed Forces Bill debate at Westminster to raise the minimum recruitment age to 18.

The call comes as it emerges that girls under 18 in the armed forces have made 16 complaints of sexual assault to the military police since 2015.

The joint letter states that recruiting children from age 16 is “unambiguously incompatible with their rights and welfare”, as it draws them out of education early, exposes them to the “intense stress of military training”, and requires them to commit to “sweeping obligations that could not lawfully be imposed on a civilian worker of any age”.

  • The UK is the only country in Europe to recruit children from age 16 into the armed forces; more soldiers are recruited at 16 than any other age.
  • The latest recruitment figures show that in the year 2020-21, one in every five new recruits was legally a child; one in four in the army (3,280 under-18s were enlisted into the armed forces; 2,410 of them joined the army).
  • Signatories of the joint letter include: the Chilren’s Law Centre, the Children’s Commissioners for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland; Amnesty International UK; The Children’s Society; Human Rights Watch; Liberty; the National Education Union; and War Child.
  • New figures from the MoD show that, in the last six years, girls under the age of 18 in the armed forces have made 16 allegations of sexual assault to the military police, equivalent to 3 per year, or one for every 75 girls.
  • Most recruits under the age of 18 train at the Army Foundation College in Harrogate. Recruits at the College, and their parents, made 60 complaints of violent behaviour by staff between 2014 and 2020.

The letter argues that this simple step forward would set the same standard in the UK that it has asked of armed forces and groups around the world, and help to bring a global ban on the military use of children into view.

Read More

Empowering Visually Impaired Children and Young People to Access Equal Education

20 May 2021

EqualEyes, a new collaborative project by the charity Angel Eyes NI, in partnership with the Children’s Law Centre, will empower visually impaired children and young people to access equal education, advocate for their rights and influence decision makers.

The project, which will provide expert led workshops to 125 children and young people, as well as their parents and carers, is being funded by The National Lottery Community Fund.

Speaking after the new funding was announced, Sara McCracken, CEO of Angel Eyes, said:

“We are excited about this partnership project bringing together expertise on the impact of visual impairment in education and knowledge of the legislation that protects the rights of children.

“The EqualEyes project will provide expert led support, education and information to ensure children with a visual impairment get the help they need to access the curriculum and give a platform to those with lived experience, so they can influence decisions.”

Children’s Law Centre Director, Paddy Kelly, added:

“The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child establishes the right for every child to freely express their views in all matters affecting them, including education. For this to be meaningful, children and young people must be aware of the rights and resources available to them.

“They must also have the tools and opportunities to influence people making the decisions at all levels, from classroom assistants to politicians.”

The dad of a visually impaired 11 year old boy, Jake, who has been receiving help and support through the charity Angel Eyes said:

“Charities like this have such a positive impact on children and parents struggling to cope. They make such a huge difference to families dealing with the daily challenges placed upon children with sight loss.

“Through the Angel Eyes events I have learnt so much. The information shared by parents and children who face similar challenges has been extremely valuable.

“The stories have been inspirational. Hearing those shared experiences and the issues many visually impaired children face in education, as well as the social interaction, has been very important. “There are so many areas I would have not considered until I spoke to other parents and children through Angel Eyes.”

Read More

Two-Tier Immigration Plan Sends ‘Horse and Cart’ Through Children’s Rights

17 May 2021

The Children’s Law Centre has raised alarm at the UK Government’s New Plan for Immigration and the impact it will have by curtailing children’s rights, placing vulnerable children in extreme danger. The alarm was raised after the Home Office consulted on the new plan and measures were announced in the Queen’s speech.

Find the CLC consultation response here

Immigration lawyers at the Children’s Law Centre say the plans water down child protection safeguards, place children at increased risk of exploitation and trample on devolved matters.

Speaking after hearing confirmation of new measures in the Queens’ Speech, an immigration solicitor from the Children’s Law Centre, Maria McCloskey said: “The proposed New Plan for Immigration creates a two-tier immigration system that will put vulnerable and traumatised children in harm’s way by sending a horse and cart through children’s rights and protections. It runs contrary to important obligations under international law, tramples on domestic laws and encroaches on devolved issues in Northern Ireland.

“The general tone and intent of the sweeping changes is deeply concerning. There is a well-established international framework for providing sanctuary and security to asylum seekers and the UK Government is proposing a seismic shift away from this. The continued assertion that routes are illegal, when it is well established that this is in fact contrary to the Refugee Convention is troubling. There is also a constant effort to attribute criminality to a group of people who are in fact the victims of criminality. There is no such thing as a good and bad refugee, just people fleeing for safety.

“At the Children’s Law Centre, we provide legal assistance to the majority of separated children and unaccompanied asylum-seeking children who arrive in Northern Ireland. We are talking about very traumatised, scared and vulnerable children. Under these new rules they would be treated as a separate and secondary tier of asylum seeker, by refusing to grant them full refugee status and the ability to remain in the UK. We have no doubt the changes will put them at increased risk of exploitation, act as a barrier to protection and add significant trauma to an already challenging process.

Read analysis of the changes from CLC immigration solicitors here

“Instead of placing children in more danger, the Home Office should be looking at ways to improve rights protections for children. They should be working on ways to provide legal routes for family reunification, ensuring primary decision making is improved, and making decisions that are lawful in the first instance. If tackling people smuggling is the aim, then provide safe and legal routes for asylum seekers.

“Children should not be punished for their nationality or immigration status. They should be protected from harm.”

Read More

New Immigration Plan Abandons Children’s Rights and Protections

12 May 2021

The proposed new immigration plan by the UK Government will trample on the rights of some of the most vulnerable children in Northern Ireland, breaching international obligations, domestic laws and devolved matters.

The changes depart from a range of international obligations and standards such as the 1951 Refugee Convention, the European Convention on Human Rights, the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) and the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings. They contradict a number of domestic laws, including the Borders Citizenship and Immigration Act 2009 and the Human Trafficking and Exploitation (Criminal Justice and Support for Victims) Act (Northern Ireland) 2015. Significantly, for Northern Ireland, the plan also encroaches on devolution; trampling powers held by a number of NI Executive departments, statutory bodies and the courts.

This is the analysis of specialist immigration solicitors within the Children’s Law Centre. The Children’s Law Centre’s immigration solicitors provide advice in relation to looked after children who are in the care of social services and whose immigration status is insecure. They also advise and represent the vast majority of unaccompanied asylum-seeking children (UASCs) in Northern Ireland, working with the Health and Social Care Board, all five Health and Social Care Trusts in Northern Ireland and Barnardo’s Independent Guardian Service. The team within the Children’s Law Centre holds extensive experience in representing unaccompanied asylum-seeking children who have been subject to the asylum application, National Referral Mechanism and other immigration application processes.

What is the New Plan for Immigration?

The proposed plan includes a number of major changes including:

  • A two-tiered system for people arriving in the UK.
  • The introduction of temporary protection status.
  • Significant changes to processing procedures.
  • Changes to referral mechanisms.
  • New enforcement methods.
Download the Children’s Law Centre’s response to the ‘New Plan for Immigration’

Many of these new changes will hit children the hardest, including separated children, UASCs and the children of asylum-seeking families. The result will see the diminution of children’s rights, including safeguarding rights and the legal child protection framework. Traumatised children will be put at risk of abuse, neglect and destitution, as well as a heightened risk of trafficking and re-trafficking.

The Watering Down of Child Protection and Safeguarding Duties

The new plan, if implemented, will create a number of new bodies with a range of powers. One of the most significant in relation to children is the National Age Assessment Board (NAAB). Where the primary duty of age assessments, currently carried out by social services, is to protect children, the NAAB will focus on immigration control. The Children’s Law Centre, and a wide range of community and civic organisations believe this is going to have a devastating impact on the well-being of children. It will dramatically increase the risk of vulnerable and traumatised children being held in detention centres, instead of getting the support they need for social services. The NAAB also opens the door to dubious age assessment methods that are entirely opposed by medical professionals and the UN High Commissioner for Refugees.

Another significant change will include a new ‘one-stop’ process that will curtail appeal rights by requiring frightened and traumatised children to immediately reveal the totality of abuse and harm they have endured. This is going to have a number of significant implications for UASCs in particular by introducing cut-off points around entitlements to protection. With many UASCs being extremely traumatised, it can often take time for them to ‘open up’ about their experiences of trafficking and abuse. This could now have implications for their access to protections. Excluding children from entitlement to safeguarding and protection from abuse is inhumane and a clear breach of Article 3 of the UNCRC and section 55 of the Borders Citizenship and Immigration Act 2009.

The proposals to withdraw financial support for asylum seekers who are deemed by the Home Office to have ‘failed’ to gain status is also deeply worrying, signaling a system of enforcement driven by the starvation and destitution of children.

Then there are additional plans seeking to erode protections for stateless children and raising the standard of proof for persecution. It is also alarmingly unclear whether detention for non-compliance with immigration rules will apply to children, or that separated children and UASCs could be placed in the newly expanded asylum estate when they turn 18. This all paints a bleak picture for the shift towards removing rights and protections from seriously vulnerable, traumatised and at-risk children.

The Heightened Risk of Trafficking and re-Trafficking

Rather than any pretence of streamlining the immigration process, it is clear to everyone outside the Home Office that the new plan will heighten the risk of trafficking and re-trafficking of children. By raising the ‘reasonable grounds’ threshold for sign-posting a child to be the victim of trafficking, children are being placed at risk of exploitation by preventing them from accessing necessary protection and support.

Separated children and UASCs may also, by the nature of their journey, be eligible for no more than temporary status under the new changes. This is due to the lack of a legal route for children to reunite with family members, described as a ‘blanket prohibition’ in the UK. This already drives vulnerable children towards trafficking, but failure to gain full status after arrival would heighten the risk of exploitation even further.

The plan completely fails to address this risk to children entering the UK. This is not a small number of vulnerable children either. Between 2010 and 2018, over 10,000 separated and unaccompanied children were granted asylum or some other form of protection in the UK. Rather than looking at how these children can be protected, the plan could be viewed as an attempt to close off the route altogether by increasing the risk of exploitation or detention of vulnerable children.

The Encroachment on Devolution

For Northern Ireland, the plan also encroaches on transferred matters under the devolved settlement. The creation of the NAAB in itself seems to ride roughshod over duties to protect children under NI law. In Northern Ireland, Social Services have a duty to conduct age assessments for the purposes of assessing what duties are owed to children under The Children (Northern Ireland) Order 1995. However, the NAAB attempts to supersede this legislation and create a new process for conducting age assessments based on border control.

The new plan for immigration also looks troubling in its approach to trafficking. Again, trafficking is not a reserved matter, it is devolved. The identification and protection of victims, and the prevention of trafficking, are duties that fall to the Police Service of Northern Ireland, the Public Prosecution Service, the various Health and Social Care Trusts, the Independent Guardian Scheme and the Northern Ireland Court Service. All issues that fall under the control of the Executive.

A Dubious Consultation Process

Finally, it is unclear or perhaps even unlikely that the consultation process for the new immigration plan fulfilled legal requirements. With a lack of detail often apparent in the proposals, a lack of time for respondents to properly complete their responses and a closed process around the opportunity to respond, meaningful engagement was significantly curtailed. A fait accompli presented to respondents.

There is almost universal opposition to the majority of the plans. This was clear throughout the consultation process. It is now down to the UK Government to engage meaningfully with the submissions that are received and to take them on board before any new legislation is introduced.

Read More

‘Build Back Better’ with Children at the Heart of a Bill of Rights

29 April 2021

A Bill of Rights, with the inclusion of specific children’s rights, underpinned by the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), could be transformative for children in Northern Ireland. It holds the possibility to address decades of failure for our children and young people, creating a framework for a brighter future.

Watch the Children’s Law Centre present evidence to the Ad Hoc Committee on a Bill of Rights

The list of issues facing children in Northern Ireland was recently highlighted in an NGO stakeholder report to the UNCRC Committee. The report illustrated how decades of systemic failure around children’s rights have had a devastating impact on children’s lives, with COVID-19 further exacerbating problems. However, a Bill of Rights for Northern Ireland would provide the perfect opportunity to build back better for children and wider society.

After presenting evidence to the NI Assembly’s Ad Hoc Committee on a Bill of Rights, Children’s Law Centre Director, Paddy Kelly, said:

“At the Children’s Law Centre, we firmly believe that a Bill of Rights for Northern Ireland could provide a new dawn for children here. It could build on general rights protections in the Human Rights Act by incorporating child specific rights as laid out by the UNCRC, rights the UK has already signed up to but remain unenforceable.

“We could see age discrimination legislation finally enacted. It could give a voice to children in care, and it could protect children from harm. Every child should have the opportunity to reach their full potential. A Bill of Rights, with specific child rights provision, could achieve that.”

Read our written briefing to the Ad Hoc Bill of Rights Committee

The Children’s Law Centre’s Director continued: “There can be no doubt that children’s rights in Northern Ireland have fallen behind and children have come to harm because of this. The results are plain for everyone to see over the past year, where Covid has exposed a weak framework of protections. There could be no better way to begin building back better than by strengthening the rights protections for our future generations.

“We have the blueprint. The UK is already a signatory to the world’s most celebrated and most complete statement on children’s rights ever produced, containing civil, political, socio-economic and cultural rights. Let’s prove our commitment to these principles, and to our children and young people, by incorporating the UNCRC in to law through a Bill of Rights for Northern Ireland.

“Where we’ve fallen behind in the past, let’s now lead the way.”

Notes: The Children’s Law Centre would like to thank Ms Moyne Anyadike-Danes for joining Paddy Kelly in presenting to the Ad Hoc Committee on a Bill of Rights. The Children’s Law Centre are privileged to have worked closely over many years with Ms Anyadike-Danes in the vindication of children’s rights. She is one of the leading children’s law experts in the jurisdiction. We would also like to acknowledge the assistance of Ms Anyadike-Danes and her colleague Junior Counsel Nick Scott BL in the preparation of CLC’s written submission to the Ad Hoc Committee.

Read More